Will ChatGPT be TIME Person of the Year 2026?
Current price
No price snapshots have been captured for this market’s primary token.
Medium gotcha risk
Gotcha risk — resolution-rule assessment
Show less
Resolution relies directly on TIME magazine covers and official feature articles. However, someone holding a position must navigate nuanced rules regarding non-human entities. If TIME names a broader concept (such as AI or LLMs) or a specific person (such as Sam Altman), ChatGPT does not qualify merely by appearing on the cover or being conceptually related; it must either be explicitly named or strictly synonymous. For unconventional conceptual titles, resolution permits interpreting the feature article to assess equivalence, which introduces some interpretive judgment.
- Wording ambiguity
- Med
- Source discretion
- Low
- Timing risk
- Low
- Exceptional clauses
- Med
Liquidity
No order-book snapshots have been captured for this market’s primary token.
Why it moved
No big moves in the last 7 days.
Resolution rules
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the listed person, group, entity, or thing is TIME Person of the Year for 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. A listed option will be considered TIME Person of the Year if they/it are explicitly named as Person of the Year. Additionally, the following rules apply: If multiple people are explicitly named person of the year, both people will be considered TIME Person of the Year. If the TIME Person of the Year is a concept, group or thing, a person may still be considered Person of the Year if they are also explicitly named person of the year, or if they are directly associated with the concept, group or thing named as person of the Year and are pictured on any official TIME cover announcing the Person of the Year. For example, in 2025 when TIME Person of the Year was “Architects of AI” the option for Sam Altman would have resolved to “Yes” as he was associated with the concept and is pictured on the Cover. However, if Sam Altman were Person of the Year, and ChatGPT was shown on the cover, this would not qualify for ChatGPT because ChatGPT is not a person. If the TIME Person of the Year is a specific concept, group, entity, or thing (e.g. artificial intelligence), listed concepts or entities will be considered Person of the Year only if they are synonymous with the announced TIME Person of the Year. For example, if ChatGPT were Person of the Year, options for AI or LLMs would resolve to “No” because, while they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous. If TIME uses language that does not refer to a specific, commonly-recognized, concept, group, entity, or thing (e.g. 2011’s “The Protester” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), the TIME Person of the Year feature article will be used to determine the meaning of the language defining TIME Person of the Year. In such cases, listed concepts, groups, or things will be considered TIME Person of the Year if they can be reasonably understood as equivalent to the meaning of the language used to define TIME Person of the Year. For example, the option for “The Me Too Movement” would have resolved to “Yes” in 2017. If for any reason the TIME's Person of the Year is not announced by June 30, 2027, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "No". The resolution source for this market will be the TIME magazine cover or covers announcing the 2026 TIME Person of the Year; however, the TIME Person of the Year Feature article may also be used.
Rules history
Rules history is not displayed yet.
Market explained
This market measures whether ChatGPT is named TIME Person of the Year for 2026. The resolution includes specific rules for how concepts, groups, or things are considered, especially if they are associated with a person or a broader category.
How it resolves
This market resolves Yes if ChatGPT is explicitly named as TIME Person of the Year for 2026. If multiple people are named, both are considered Person of the Year. If the Person of the Year is a concept, group, or thing, ChatGPT will be considered Person of the Year only if it is synonymous with the announced TIME Person of the Year. For example, if 'artificial intelligence' is named, ChatGPT would not qualify as it is not synonymous. If TIME uses language that does not refer to a specific, commonly-recognized concept, group, entity, or thing, the TIME Person of the Year feature article will be used to determine the meaning, and ChatGPT will be considered Person of the Year if it can be reasonably understood as equivalent to that meaning. This market resolves No if ChatGPT is not named TIME Person of the Year for 2026, or if TIME's Person of the Year is not announced by June 30, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. The resolution source will be the TIME magazine cover or covers announcing the 2026 TIME Person of the Year, with the TIME Person of the Year Feature article also potentially used.
Key dates
- Last announcement date: — If TIME's Person of the Year is not announced by this date, the market resolves No.
Resolution source
TIME magazine cover or covers announcing the 2026 TIME Person of the Year; however, the TIME Person of the Year Feature article may also be used.
AI-generated analysis · google/gemini-2.5-flash ·
Community forecast
Community forecasting arrives with the forecast tools.